I've been reading Edward Heron-Allen's book The Language of the Hand, which was published in the late 1800's -- a time when palmistry, phrenology, and other pseudosciences were popular. Although such practices have been falsified by modern science, this rational biologist shamelessly admits to getting a thrill each time he cracks open a fortune cookie. Imagine how I would feel if this legendary foraminiferologist read my palm?
I'm curious: Notice the lines around the eyes of a young Sam Bowser:
These lines are physically closer to his spirit center; they should, by such proximity, be more revealing than those on his palm. (As I explore methods of meditation and related healing approaches, I've noticed that this sort of logic has been employed throughout the ages.)
Eye lines revealed using highly sophisticated imaging algorithms, from images obtained while: (1) smiling, (2) resting, (3) experiencing unbearable pain, (4) laughing like a madman. Notice that the contrast of the eye lines accurately reflects emotional status. Note also that eye lines deflect at different angles relative to their resting position. I'm sure that all of this can be formulated into a new, highly "scientific" way to interpret the psyche and predict the future. Let me know if it's already been done - I don't want to waste my time!
These lines also mirror the patterns made by pseudopodia extended by foraminiferan protists. Perhaps this means that I will be a benthic foraminiferan in my next life? (No, I've made other plans.) Or perhaps I was simply destined to study these organisms...
Pseudopodia extended by the foraminiferan protist Allogromia laticollaris, initially photographed using differential interference optics, but then subjected to the same imaging algorithms used for enhancing eye lines. As can be seen by the concordance of pseudopodial patterns with my crow's feet, it's clear that I was destined to be a foraminiferologist!
Mental sparks fly while reading Heron-Allen's text, and wildly incongruous connections are made. If afforded the opportunity to talk with him today, it seems likely that the discussion would center on how he reconciled his early years as a palm reader with his later years as a scientist. If he defended palmistry as a science to the end, then I would have to point out that the body is riddled with lines and patterns. Why restrict psychoanalysis and fortune-telling to those of the hand?
I'm curious: Notice the lines around the eyes of a young Sam Bowser:
These lines are physically closer to his spirit center; they should, by such proximity, be more revealing than those on his palm. (As I explore methods of meditation and related healing approaches, I've noticed that this sort of logic has been employed throughout the ages.)
- Did they predict the years he would spend squinting in Antarctic summer sun?
- Did they predict the chiseled grimaces of trigeminal neuralgia (TGN)?
- Did they predict years of billowing mad-scientist laughter?
Perhaps these lines are simply the consequence of his genetic stock. (Some say he has his granny's eyes. Should this also be true for the lines of his hands?)
Those lines around his eyes have become more exaggerated over the years, and are now seen to possess certain bird-like attributes. Further curiosity: What do these crow's feet foretell?
- More squinting in the Antarctic sun?
- More episodes of TGN?
- More unbridled laughter?
Eye lines revealed using highly sophisticated imaging algorithms, from images obtained while: (1) smiling, (2) resting, (3) experiencing unbearable pain, (4) laughing like a madman. Notice that the contrast of the eye lines accurately reflects emotional status. Note also that eye lines deflect at different angles relative to their resting position. I'm sure that all of this can be formulated into a new, highly "scientific" way to interpret the psyche and predict the future. Let me know if it's already been done - I don't want to waste my time!
These lines also mirror the patterns made by pseudopodia extended by foraminiferan protists. Perhaps this means that I will be a benthic foraminiferan in my next life? (No, I've made other plans.) Or perhaps I was simply destined to study these organisms...
Pseudopodia extended by the foraminiferan protist Allogromia laticollaris, initially photographed using differential interference optics, but then subjected to the same imaging algorithms used for enhancing eye lines. As can be seen by the concordance of pseudopodial patterns with my crow's feet, it's clear that I was destined to be a foraminiferologist!
This exercise proves to me that curiosity can lead to some strange connections. When depicted with skill, some might even call these connections art. In my hands, however, they seem more of a time sink. That is, until this Doctor of Philosophy improves his social status and makes some money by interpreting eyelines of the elite, as his hero Heron-Allen did so many years ago.
Imagine Dr. Bowser telling wealthy, curious souls their fortunes while they wink at him!(?)
Posts
Sam, I remember EH-A's Chiromancy book Oh, so well! You're definitely on to something here. Off you go then, Dr. of Philosophy!
ReplyDeleteIt is the close observation [very close with your techno machine capabilities], comparing via critical thinking, and then musings, that is more akin to "the artist's mind" than changing one's clothes.
ReplyDeleteJust last night on the Charlie Rose show, Jeffrey Hammerbacher, a young data-collection/storage Harvard grad [now chief scientist at Cloudera] was talking about the advantages of "big data" in relation to his own recently diagnosed mental illness. He spoke about how a couple of scientists were collecting data via physical sensing devices about their own illnesses because our current medical practitioners have too little quantifiable information to make knowledgeable assessments upon. He's devoting his life's work to this situation which he hopes will also bring-down medical costs. Your crows-feet examination seems an excellent start for your personal health database.
They don't make polymaths like they used to. An expert fiddle-maker too with some sharp observations on early definitions of intelligence (not that definitions have improved much).
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Cynthia says in her first sentence. One of the things artists do is attend to visual relationships and creating new meanings from them. It also would not surprise me if you found similar branching structures elsewhere in nature, including larger organisms like trees.
ReplyDelete